We Value Your Privacy

We use cookies for analytics and advertising measurement.

Skip to main content
A person using sign language during a job interview with a hiring manager in a professional office setting.
Employment LawCivil RightsCase Studies

Damar Services Pays $65K in Deaf Applicant Bias Case

Damar Services will pay $65,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit after allegedly rejecting a deaf job applicant for a housekeeping position in Indiana.

Case Value Expert

Damar Services Settles EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit

Damar Services, Inc., an Indianapolis-based residential services provider, has agreed to pay $65,000 to resolve a federal lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). According to official reports, the suit alleged that the company discriminated against a deaf applicant by refusing to hire them for a housekeeping position because of their disability. The EEOC maintained that the applicant was fully qualified for the role, yet was denied the opportunity without an individualized assessment of their abilities. In addition to the monetary payout, the settlement requires Damar to implement new training programs and revise its anti-discrimination policies. This case serves as a stark reminder that even organizations dedicated to serving those with developmental disabilities must strictly adhere to federal employment laws.

Affected by a Employment Law Issue?

Our specialized tool can help you estimate the potential worth of your case based on current laws and precedents.

What's My Case Worth?

Understanding Liability in Hiring Discrimination Cases

In the eyes of the law, employers are prohibited from making hiring decisions based on a candidate's disability rather than their objective qualifications. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), companies must provide reasonable accommodations unless doing so would cause an undue hardship on operations. In this instance, the liability likely centered on the failure to engage in an interactive process to determine if the deaf applicant could perform essential job functions with or without assistance. When a company rejects a candidate solely because they are deaf, they may be found liable for back pay, compensatory damages, and even punitive measures if the conduct was particularly egregious. Proving these claims often requires showing that the disability was the primary factor in the adverse employment decision.

How to Protect Your Rights After an Illegal Rejection

If you suspect that a job offer was withheld or rescinded due to a disability, you should begin by documenting every communication with the prospective employer. Save emails, text messages, and job descriptions, as these pieces of evidence are vital for building a case similar to the Walmart disability hiring settlement. It is also highly beneficial to file a formal charge with the EEOC to trigger an investigation into the company’s hiring practices. To get an idea of what your potential legal claim might be worth, you can use our free case calculator to evaluate your situation. Early action is critical, as failing to meet strict federal deadlines can permanently bar you from seeking justice and financial recovery.

Assessing Settlement Values for Employment Bias

Settlement amounts in disability discrimination cases like this $65,000 award vary based on several financial and emotional factors. Victims are often entitled to recover lost wages, known as back pay, along with the value of lost benefits and potential "front pay" if the job can no longer be secured. Non-economic damages, such as emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life, also play a significant role in determining the final wrongful termination settlement value. The EEOC provides guidance on how these compensatory damages are calculated under federal caps. Understanding these variables helps victims set realistic expectations when entering negotiations with large corporations or service providers.

Federal Protections Under the Americans with Disabilities Act

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is the primary federal statute that shields job seekers from unfair treatment based on physical or mental impairments. Employers with 15 or more employees must comply with these regulations, ensuring that employment opportunities are accessible to all qualified individuals. This framework is similar to other civil rights protections, such as those discussed in the case where the EEOC sued Buc-ee’s for disability discrimination. It is important to note that the statute of limitations for filing an ADA claim with the EEOC is typically 180 days, though this can extend to 300 days in certain states with their own enforcement agencies.

Evaluate Your Potential Discrimination Claim Today

Facing workplace discrimination or a biased hiring process can be an isolating and frustrating experience, but you do not have to navigate the legal landscape alone. Our tools are designed to help you understand the strength of your case and the potential compensation you could receive for your losses. If you believe your rights were violated in Indiana or any other state, taking the first step towards accountability is essential for your future and for ensuring other applicants are treated fairly. We encourage you to try our Indiana civil rights calculator to get an instant estimate of your claim's value. Secure the justice you deserve by documenting your experience and exploring your legal options today.

Share this article:

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance regarding your situation, please consult with a qualified attorney.