What a damage cap is, and what it is not

Malpractice damages come in three kinds. Economic damages are the losses with a paper trail: bills already paid, the cost of future care, and wages or earning capacity lost to the injury. Non-economic damages compensate what has no invoice: pain, suffering, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, a spouse’s loss of companionship. Punitive damages punish conduct that was intentional or “wanton and willful” rather than merely careless (Legal Information Institute); they are rare in malpractice, where the usual failing is a mistake, not malice. Nearly every cap aims at the second kind. Economic damages pass through untouched in all but a total-cap state such as Indiana, and punitive caps are usually general tort rules expressed as a multiple of the compensatory award.
The mechanics matter as much as the figure. Texas caps non-economic damages at $250,000 per claimant against all physicians and other individual providers combined, $250,000 per hospital or other institution, and $500,000 against all institutions together, so the stacked ceiling with a physician and two hospitals is $750,000 (Civil Practice and Remedies Code 74.301). California’s cap, $250,000 for decades, was rewritten in 2022: it restarted at $350,000 for injury and $500,000 for death on January 1, 2023, and rises by $40,000 and $50,000 a year until the two figures reach $750,000 and $1,000,000, with inflation adjustments after that (Civil Code 3333.2). The jury is usually not told a cap exists; the judge reduces the verdict afterward.
Caps are also litigated. Florida’s Supreme Court struck the state’s malpractice cap for wrongful death in 2014 and for personal injury in 2017, holding that the caps “violate equal protection under the rational basis test because the arbitrary reduction of compensation without regard to the severity of the injury does not bear a rational relationship” to the purpose the legislature gave (North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan); the struck section, 766.118, is still printed in the Florida code. Courts in other states have reached similar results under their own constitutions, and others have upheld caps, so a cap on the books is usually enforceable but not always. Add exceptions for catastrophic injury or death, inflation indexing and the fault rule (Florida’s chapter 766 claims stay on pure comparative fault after the state’s 2023 move to a 51 percent bar), and two claims with the same injury can end far apart.