Strict liability, the one-bite rule, and the states that mix them

A strict-liability statute makes the owner responsible for a bite without asking what the owner knew or did. California’s is the model: “The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place” (Civil Code 3342). Florida’s adds the words that matter most, liability “regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owners’ knowledge of such viciousness” (Florida Statutes 767.04). The claim then turns on the statute’s own conditions: an actual bite, a person who was allowed to be where they were, and a defendant who owns the dog or, in some states, keeps it.
The one-bite rule is the older, court-made alternative, and it is a knowledge requirement: the person bitten must show “that the dog owner either knew or was negligent in not knowing that the dog had a propensity to injure people” (Legal Information Institute). The name misleads. No state gives an owner a free bite; growling, lunging, prior complaints to animal control or a warning sign can all establish the knowledge. Where knowledge cannot be shown, ordinary negligence remains: an owner who breaks a leash law or lets a dog roam can be liable for carelessness. Our database records the one-bite or negligence rule as the general rule in eight states: Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Texas and Virginia.
Between the two poles sit the mixed statutes, which is why the chart carries a note. Some states impose strict liability only once a dog has been formally declared dangerous; New York, for one, makes the owner of a dangerous dog “strictly liable for medical costs resulting from injury caused by such dog” and leaves other losses to its negligence and knowledge rules (Agriculture and Markets Law 123). Others limit strict liability to public places and lawful visitors, write a reduction for the victim’s own negligence into the statute, as Florida does, or exempt police and military dogs, as California does. Two defenses survive in almost every system: trespass, because the statutes protect only people lawfully present, and provocation, which is decided case by case under each state’s law.