Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit: WaveWriter Alpha Claims - CaseValue.law
Skip to main content
A close-up of a medical professional's gloved hands holding a small, metallic neurostimulation device against a sterile blue background.
Product Liability

Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit: WaveWriter Alpha Problems

A new lawsuit claims Boston Scientific's WaveWriter Alpha spinal cord stimulator is defective. Learn about your rights and potential compensation for injuries.

Case Value Expert

Boston Scientific Faces Litigation Over WaveWriter Alpha

A new product liability lawsuit has been filed against Boston Scientific regarding its WaveWriter Alpha spinal cord stimulator (SCS) system, according to recent reports. The plaintiff alleges that the medical device, designed to manage chronic pain, failed prematurely and caused significant internal complications. These devices are implanted near the spine to deliver electrical pulses, but malfunctions can lead to severe neurological issues or the need for painful revision surgeries. This case highlights growing concerns over the long-term safety of advanced neurostimulation technology used in modern medicine. Patients who expected relief are now facing additional medical hurdles due to these alleged technical failures.

Affected by a Product Liability Issue?

Our specialized tool can help you estimate the potential worth of your case based on current laws and precedents.

Check Case Worth

Understanding Liability in Medical Device Failure Claims

When a medical device like the WaveWriter Alpha fails, the manufacturer may be held liable under several legal theories, including strict product liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. In many cases, plaintiffs argue that the device had a design defect or a manufacturing flaw that made it unreasonably dangerous for its intended use. Lawyers also look into whether the manufacturer provided adequate warnings to physicians and patients about known risks or high failure rates. Under Cornell Law School's definition of product liability, companies are responsible for ensuring their products meet safety expectations. If Boston Scientific knew about potential malfunctions and failed to act, they could face substantial punitive damages in addition to compensatory awards.

What to Do if Your Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunctions

If you suspect that your spinal cord stimulator is failing or causing unusual symptoms, your first priority must be seeking immediate medical evaluation from your specialist. Document all symptoms, including increased pain, unexpected shocks, or loss of sensation, and keep a detailed log of when these issues occur. It is also vital to preserve any medical records related to the original implantation and any subsequent diagnostic tests or revision procedures. Understanding how product recalls affect case value can help you navigate the complexities of a legal claim if the device is officially pulled from the market. Finally, consulting with a legal professional who understands the nuances of medical device litigation can ensure your rights are protected from the start.

Potential Damages in a Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit

Victims of defective spinal cord stimulators may be eligible for various types of compensation to cover the physical and financial toll of their injuries. Economic damages typically include medical bills for the initial surgery, costs for revision or removal procedures, and lost wages if the injury prevented you from working. Non-economic damages address the pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of quality of life caused by the device failure. To understand the full scope of your potential recovery, you can refer to our guide on product liability settlements. Settlement values often depend on the severity of the permanent injury and the clarity of the evidence proving medical negligence or device defect.

Federal Regulations and Statutes for Medical Devices

Medical devices in the United States are heavily regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which classifies spinal cord stimulators as high-risk Class III devices. Because these products are subject to federal preemption laws, filing a lawsuit requires demonstrating that the manufacturer violated specific federal safety requirements. Additionally, every state has its own statute of limitations, which dictates the timeframe in which a plaintiff must file a claim after discovering an injury. Failure to file within this window can permanently bar a victim from seeking justice, making it crucial to act quickly. Legal teams must meticulously analyze whether the manufacturer followed the Premarket Approval process and if any surveillance data was suppressed.

Calculate Your Potential WaveWriter Alpha Case Value

Navigating a complex lawsuit against a major corporation like Boston Scientific can be overwhelming, but you do not have to face it alone. Our team is dedicated to helping victims of defective medical devices understand their legal options and the true value of their claims. By using our free case evaluation tool, you can get a clearer picture of what your specific situation might be worth based on current legal trends and past settlements. Don't let the window for justice close while you are suffering from a manufacturer's oversight. Take the first step toward securing the compensation you deserve by starting your free assessment today and let us help you hold the responsible parties accountable.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance regarding your situation, please consult with a qualified attorney.