Covidien ProGrip Hernia Mesh Lawsuit & MDL Update 2024 - CaseValue.law
Skip to main content
Covidien ProGrip Hernia Mesh Lawsuit: 2,200 Claims Join MDL
Personal InjuryProduct Liability

Covidien ProGrip Hernia Mesh Lawsuit: 2,200 Claims Join MDL

Over 2,200 Covidien ProGrip hernia mesh claims have been centralized in an MDL. Learn about design defects and how to calculate your potential claim value.

Case Value Expert

Covidien ProGrip Claims Centralized in Massive Federal Litigation

The litigation surrounding Covidien’s ProGrip hernia mesh continues to expand as more victims come forward seeking justice for their surgical complications. According to recent reports, there are now over 2,200 claims consolidated in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) against the manufacturer. These lawsuits allege that the ProGrip mesh, which uses a unique self-gripping technology, is prone to migration and causes severe internal damage. Many plaintiffs have reported requiring multiple revision surgeries to address complications that were never properly disclosed by the company. As the number of filings grows, the court is moving toward selecting bellwether trials to test the legal theories and evidence presented by the victims.

Affected by a Product Liability Issue?

Our specialized tool can help you estimate the potential worth of your case based on current laws and precedents.

Check Case Worth

Identifying the Design Defects Behind ProGrip Mesh Failures

From a legal perspective, the liability in these cases primarily stems from theories of strict product liability and failure to warn. The Covidien ProGrip mesh is designed with thousands of tiny "micro-grips" intended to eliminate the need for sutures, but legal experts argue this design is inherently flawed. These grips can cause the mesh to adhere to organs or nerves, leading to chronic, debilitating pain and internal scarring that is difficult to treat. Furthermore, plaintiffs argue that Covidien knew or should have known about these risks yet failed to provide adequate warnings to surgeons and patients. This lack of transparency prevented medical professionals from making fully informed decisions about the risks of using this specific medical device during hernia repair procedures.

Crucial Steps for Patients Suffering from Mesh Complications

If you suspect your hernia mesh has failed or is causing health issues, your first step must be a consultation with a medical specialist to assess the integrity of the implant. It is vital to request your original operative reports to confirm that a Covidien ProGrip or similar device was used during your initial surgery. Documenting your symptoms daily, including pain levels and physical limitations, creates a clear timeline of the harm you have suffered since the implantation. Similar to the process for those involved in an AngioDynamics Vortex port catheter failure, preserving any removed medical hardware after a revision surgery is critical for evidence. Contacting a legal professional early can help you understand the specific filing deadlines and ensure your rights are protected throughout the litigation process.

Calculating Potential Damages in a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Compensation in hernia mesh lawsuits is designed to cover both the financial and emotional toll the defective device has taken on the victim's life. Damages typically include the cost of initial and revision surgeries, ongoing medical monitoring, and lost wages for those unable to return to work. Beyond economic losses, plaintiffs can seek recovery for non-economic damages such as pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and reduced quality of life. Settlement amounts vary significantly based on the severity of the injury, the number of corrective procedures required, and the long-term prognosis of the patient. While it is too early to predict exact settlement figures for the Covidien MDL, historical mesh settlements suggest that more severe injuries typically result in higher compensation brackets.

The centralization of these cases into MDL No. 3029 in the District of Massachusetts allows for more efficient handling of thousands of individual claims. Unlike a class action, each plaintiff in an MDL maintains their own case, but pretrial proceedings like discovery and evidence gathering are handled collectively. This process is governed by federal product liability laws and state-specific statutes of limitations, which dictate how long a victim has to file a claim after discovering their injury. Because these timelines vary by state, it is essential to act quickly to ensure your claim is filed before the legal window closes. The outcome of upcoming bellwether trials will likely serve as a roadmap for how future settlements will be negotiated for the thousands of remaining plaintiffs.

Evaluate Your Hernia Mesh Claim with Our Free Tool

Navigating the complexities of a medical device lawsuit can be overwhelming, especially when you are dealing with chronic pain and health complications. Our goal is to provide you with the resources necessary to understand the strength of your case and the potential compensation you may be entitled to recover. We offer a comprehensive and free case evaluation tool that analyzes the specifics of your situation to give you a clearer picture of your legal options. By answering a few simple questions about your surgery and subsequent complications, you can take the first step toward holding the manufacturer accountable. Don’t wait to find out what your case is worth; use our evaluator today to begin the journey toward the justice and recovery you deserve.

Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance regarding your situation, please consult with a qualified attorney.